madmark.myfastforum.org Forum Index madmark.myfastforum.org
Fuck the system!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

YouTube video--proof flight 93 was empty.

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    madmark.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Tuesday, July 29th '08
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertising.






Posted:     Post subject:

Back to top
Mark
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 1052



PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:04 am    Post subject: YouTube video--proof flight 93 was empty.  Reply with quote

Flight 93: Cell Call Exposed 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjNB9MGSoWc

Cold blooded.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JohnP
Facilitator


Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 9



PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's another theory that says the plane landed elsewhere, but the only problem with this story is that the plane was visible on the radar from the control tower, then disappeared. How easy is it to spoof a plane on such high tech gear, and then somehow make the little dot on the screen disappear? Which is why this "empty plane" theory looks more likely.

However....take a look at this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s&feature=related

The hole in Shanksville was apparently there prior to the so-called crash, and there are no apparent pieces on the ground. So maybe the plane landed elsewhere, which doesn't solve the mystery of "how the radars lost track of the plane". It's a tangled mess and anything seems possible except the official version.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dyfet
Facilitator


Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Posts: 15


Location: Varies

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:16 am    Post subject: And the strange case of the mispainted plane... Reply with quote

This goes along with the curious question of the repainted plane that flew into the south tower (flt 175).  These digital stills
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html

besides pointing out the profile of the aircraft is wrong for a 767, also, though unnoticed by the author, lacks the proper paint job...the engine coverlets were not painted dark blue then, and the ones that later were had the entire underbelly also painted dark blue to match.  

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki...oeing_767-300_United_Airlines.JPG

From the pictures of flight 175, you can clearly see the coverlet is painted from the right wing that is not hidden in shadow, and consistent with the one that is.  Indeed, given the angle of the lighting, and the fact the fuselage bottom "stripe" is consistent on the left and right, like the coverlets, it is tempting to say that is not shadow but part of the paint scheme as well.  There are 767's which were painted with dark blue bottom "stripes" that are narrower than the whole underbelly, and these too as far as I can find never were flown by United either...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JohnP
Facilitator


Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 9



PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems to tie in, a modus operandi emerges: the planes were switched, and probably remote controlled (precision of the impacts). What I can't seem to grasp is how this could fool the control towers...unless the replacement planes took off from the same airports as the regular flights. Maybe the passengers were held back and told the planes were late. Now the question is whether these makeshift-767's could take off from big regular airports without looking suspicious. Would the untrained eye notice anything strange about them? Are there special, remote areas in these particular airports (11 and 175:Boston's Logan Airport, 77: Dulles International Airport, 93: Newark International Airport)  that allowed these flights to take off without gathering too much attention?

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/bodycount.html#flights
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hoop



Joined: 17 May 2008
Posts: 11



PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How does level-headed focus on this event get so muddled?

Quote:
It's a tangled mess and anything seems possible except the official version.


BINGO!


9/11 was a magnificent PSYOP:
In this particular instance..

planes.. planes.. planes.. planes.. planes.. planes

Quote:
The purpose of United States psychological operations (PSYOP) is to induce or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to U.S. objectives.



Pay close attention (visually and verbally)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR183M_VJas


I think Evan Fairbanks has earned himself some type of slight of hand award.. or who knows maybe he's pushing daisies up with Jennings..  Twisted Evil

Planes would crash AGAINST buildings of this construction (in the real world) they don't "go in one side and out the other"


Perspective:

http://micom.net/oops/Plane%20eats%20Pelican.jpg

http://micom.net/oops/plane%20vs%20trailer.jpg

http://micom.net/oops/oops1.jpg



Quote:
These were not curtain walls but cages of steel columns spaced just over a yard apart, with 22 inches of glass in between. (Minoru Yamasaki, the building's architect, designed it this way in part because he was insecure with heights and felt more comfortable with such narrow windows.)


http://www.yowusa.com/war/2006/war-2006-02a/wtc_steelbeams.jpg

(photo depicts the tower walls BEFORE the concrete was poured for the floors)

Hmm.. at what point did these "planes" meet resistance?
..certainly not  when their fiberglass/aluminum composite noses came into contact with the steel walls (Forget about the resistance from the steel reinforced concrete floors)
These  "planes" are 159 ft. in length.
The space between the outer walls and the central core columns is 60 feet on two sides, 35 on the other two sides.

Another really good perspective aligner:

http://video.google.com/videoplay...q=building+the+world+trade+center

Simply put, it was exactly like Evan Fairbanks told the world..
..it just disappeared like a bad special effect..

Hot Damn!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    madmark.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Tuesday, July 29th '08 All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum